RNA Targets
Pan-Tumor IO
Research Use Only
Immunotherapy Gene Expression
Reference Targets
Reference Targets
A biologically curated RNA target reference for immunotherapy response profiling across all solid tumor indications — enabling researchers to select genes spanning T cell exhaustion states, checkpoint ligand biology, myeloid polarization, TLS programs, and metabolic immune escape to build custom Tapestri assays. Designed to simultaneously resolve the TCF7+ progenitor-exhausted T cell fraction, TREM2+ macrophage resistance program, and TLS B cell response signature — beyond the reach of any bulk RNA assay.
221
Total Genes
7
Functional Categories
3
ICI Response Predictors
10+
Tumor Indications
1
Panel Power Scorecard & Functional Categories
● Panel Power Scorecard
Panel Score: 84 / 100
93%
Landmark
Biomarker
Coverage
Biomarker
Coverage
80%
COSMIC
Tier-1
Coverage
Tier-1
Coverage
14 genes
FDA
Biomarker
Genes
Biomarker
Genes
22 genes
Clinical Trial
Biomarkers
Biomarkers
10 states
Cell States
Resolvable
Resolvable
221 genes
Total Panel
Genes
Genes
Published precedent — targeted panels are sufficient
Sade-Feldman et al. 2018 Cell — minimal gene set sufficient to predict ICI response
Jerby-Arnon et al. 2018 Cell — 200-gene resistance program detected by targeted panel
118
T Cell Identity & Exhaustion
40
Checkpoint & Antigen Presentation
48
Myeloid & NK
26
TLS & B Cell
28
IFN & TIS Score
22
DDR / TMB / MSI
28
Metabolic Escape
2
Target Curation Principles
Commercial Assays
- Foundation Medicine FoundationOne CDx (TMB, MSI, PD-L1)
- Tempus xT RNA (IO biomarker modules)
- NanoString nCounter IO 360 Panel
- Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 (TMB/MSI/IO)
- HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay
- Fluidigm / Standard BioTools Maxpar IO panels
- BD Rhapsody Immune Gene Expression assay
Public Databases
- TCGA pan-cancer TIMER immune estimates
- MSigDB hallmark & C7 immunologic gene sets
- TISIDB / TIMER2.0 immune infiltration databases
- Human Cell Atlas (PBMC, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes)
- CancerSEA single-cell functional states database
- ImmPort immunology reference gene sets
Peer-Reviewed Literature
- Sade-Feldman et al. 2018 Cell (TCF7 ICI response)
- Guo et al. 2018 Nature Med (T cell exhaustion atlas)
- Helmink et al. 2020 Nature (TLS ICI response)
- Jerby-Arnon et al. 2018 Cell (resistance program)
- Thorsson et al. 2018 Immunity (pan-cancer immune)
- KEYNOTE / CheckMate / IMpower biomarker studies
Why Single-Cell for IO Response?
Bulk RNA IO biomarkers (PD-L1 IHC, TMB) have poor predictive value because they average across heterogeneous cell populations. Tapestri resolves which specific cell types express checkpoint ligands, identifies the TCF7+ progenitor-exhausted CD8 T cell fraction that predicts ICI response, and links each immune cell’s state to its somatic mutations — all simultaneously at single-cell resolution.
Three Validated scRNA-seq ICI Predictors Covered
This reference captures all three established single-cell ICI response predictors: (1) TCF7+ progenitor-exhausted CD8 T cells (expansion = responders), (2) tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) B cell signatures (CD20+/CXCL13+/AID+ = IO responders), and (3) TREM2+ immunosuppressive macrophage program (enriched = IO resistance). No bulk assay resolves all three simultaneously.
3
Target Reference Structure — Gene Table
1 · T Cell Identity & Exhaustion2 · Checkpoint Ligands & Antigen Presentation3 · Myeloid & NK States4 · TLS & B Cell Programs5 · IFN Signaling & TIS Score6 · DNA Damage / TMB / MSI7 · Metabolic Immune Escape
| Category | Representative Genes (n) | Biological Function | Platform Relevance | scD+R Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · T Cell Identity & Exhaustion States · 64 genes | ||||
| Progenitor / Stem Exhausted | TCF7, CXCR5, CCR7, IL7R, SELL (CD62L), BCL6, TOX2, LEF1, FOXO1, SLAMF6, MYB, KLF2, CD27, CD28 (14) | Progenitor-exhausted CD8 T cell identity; stem-like self-renewal | TCF7+ progenitor-exhausted T cells expand on ICI; loss = terminal exhaustion; key pan-tumor responder biomarker | Identify TCF7-high progenitor pool; track progenitor-to-effector transition per cell over treatment |
| Terminally Exhausted | TOX, NR4A1, NR4A2, PDCD1, HAVCR2, LAG3, TIGIT, CTLA4, ENTPD1 (CD39), EOMES, PRDM1, BATF, VHL (13) | Terminal exhaustion TF network; irreversible epigenetic silencing | TOX/NR4A co-expression = terminally exhausted ICI-refractory T cells; BATF drives dysfunction | Quantify terminally exhausted vs progenitor-exhausted ratio; key ICI resistance metric |
| Effector / Cytotoxic | GZMB, GZMA, GZMK, PRF1, NKG7, IFNG, TBX21, CX3CR1, FCGR3A, KLRG1, GNLY, RUNX3, ZEB2 (13) | CTL effector function; cytotoxic killing; effector memory | High GZMB/PRF1 = immediate cytolytic capacity; CX3CR1+ = circulating effector CTL (blood biomarker potential) | Distinguish effector (GZMB+), transitional (GZMK+), exhausted (HAVCR2+) CD8 T cell states |
| Th / Tfh / Treg | CD4, BCL6, FOXP3, CXCR5, ICOS, IL21, RORC, IL17A, IL10, TGFB1, IL2RA, IKZF2 (Helios), ENTPD1, TNFRSF18 (GITR) (14) | Th1/Th17/Tfh/Treg identity; GC help; immunosuppression | BCL6+CXCR5+ Tfh drive TLS GC; FOXP3+ Tregs suppress CTL; Treg:CTL ratio = prognosis | Resolve Th/Tfh/Treg states; link BCR-help Tfh to B cell activation |
| Tissue-Resident Memory (Trm) | CD69, ITGAE (CD103), CXCR6, ZNF683 (Hobit), BHLHE40, S1PR1 (low), KLF4, RBPJ (8) + 56 accessory | Tissue-resident memory identity; local immune surveillance | CD69+CD103+ Trm = favorable prognosis in NSCLC/melanoma; density correlates with ICI benefit | Identify Trm at tumor site; distinguish from circulating T cells |
| 2 · Checkpoint Ligands & Antigen Presentation · 40 genes | ||||
| Checkpoint Ligands | CD274 (PD-L1), PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2), CD80, CD86, NECTIN2, HHLA2 (B7H7), VSIR (VISTA), CD47, LILRB2, SIGLEC9, IDO1, IDO2, CD200, TIGIT (14) | Checkpoint ligand expression on tumor and myeloid cells | PD-L1 = pembrolizumab/atezolizumab eligibility; CD47 = magrolimab; HHLA2/VSIR = emerging targets; IDO1 = tryptophan depletion | Identify checkpoint ligand-expressing tumor subpopulations; resolve PD-L1+ tumor vs macrophage |
| MHC-I Antigen Presentation | HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, B2M, TAP1, TAP2, TAPBP, PSMB8, PSMB9, NLRC5, IRF1, STAT1, JAK1, JAK2, CALR, HSPA5 (16) | MHC-I antigen processing; IFN-γ response | B2M loss = primary ICI resistance pan-tumor; JAK1/2 mut. = acquired resistance; IFN-γ MHC-I upregulation predicts response | Map MHC-I-loss tumor subpopulations; identify antigen presentation defects per clonal group |
| MHC-II & APC | HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPA1, CD74, CIITA, STAT6, CLEC9A, XCR1, LILRA4, PTGDS (10) | MHC-II on tumor cells; cDC1/pDC identity | Tumor MHC-II = favorable response; CIITA drives adaptive MHC-II; cDC1 (CLEC9A+) cross-present antigens; pDC = type I IFN producers | Distinguish APCs from MHC-II-expressing tumor cells |
| 3 · Myeloid & NK States · 48 genes | ||||
| Tumor-Associated Macrophages | CD68, CD163, MRC1, CSF1R, TREM2, APOE, SPP1, C1QA, C1QB, LYVE1, FOLR2, SELENOP, MMP9, CCL18, MARCO (15) | TAM subtype identity; immunosuppressive vs inflammatory | SPP1+ and TREM2+ TAMs = IO resistance; C1Q+ resident macrophages = favorable; SPP1/TREM2 ratio = resistance score | Classify TAM subtypes; identify TREM2+ macrophage accumulation as resistance biomarker |
| Monocyte / M1-like Myeloid | CD14, FCGR3A, VCAN, FCN1, S100A8, S100A9, IL1B, IL6, CXCL8, TNF, CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, ARG1, NOS2, IL10 (16) | Classical/non-classical monocyte identity; M1/M2 polarization | IFN-γ-activated CXCL9/10+ M1-like myeloid = favorable; ARG1+ M2 = immunosuppressive | Distinguish inflammatory M1-like vs tolerogenic M2-like myeloid states per cell |
| NK Cells | NCAM1, KLRD1, NKG7, NCR1, KLRB1, FCGR3A, KLRC1 (NKG2A), KLRK1 (NKG2D), PRF1, GZMB, XCL1, B2M, HLA-E, MICA, MICB, EOMES (16) + 1 overlap | NK cytotoxicity; NKG2D ligand stress sensing | NKG2A/HLA-E axis = NK inhibition; NKG2D ligands (MICA/B) = stress markers; NK dysfunction in cold tumors | Quantify NK functional state; identify HLA-E-mediated NK evasion |
| 4 · TLS & B Cell Programs · 26 genes | ||||
| TLS / B Cell / pDC | MS4A1, CD19, CD79A, CR2, CXCR5, CXCL13, AICDA, PRDM1, IRF4, XBP1, IGHG1, IGHM, CD27, CD38, PAX5, BCL6, LILRA4, XCR1, CLEC9A, PTGDS (20) | TLS GC reaction; plasma cell differentiation; pDC IFN production | TLS (CXCL13+/AID+/CD20+) = strong ICI predictor in melanoma, sarcoma, NSCLC; pDC = type I IFN source | Identify TLS clusters; quantify GC B cell vs plasma cell ratio; detect pDC |
| Stromal Exclusion | CXCL12, ACTA2, FAP, PDGFRB, TGFB1, SMAD4, MMP2, COL1A1, VEGFA, POSTN, LRRC15 (11) - overlap trimmed | CAF-driven T cell exclusion; TGF-β resistance | CAF CXCL12 traps T cells at tumor margin; TGF-β drives CAF activation and IO resistance; anti-TGF-β + ICI synergy | Identify CXCL12-high exclusion barriers; resolve excluded vs infiltrated architecture |
| 5 · IFN Signaling & Tumor Inflammation Score · 28 genes | ||||
| IFN-γ / TIS Score | IFNG, IFNGR1, STAT1, IRF1, IRF7, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, GBP1, GBP2, PSMB9, TAP1, HLA-DRA, PDCD1LG2, LAG3, TIGIT (16) | IFN-γ signaling; tumor inflammation score; ICI response prediction | TIS (18-gene IFN-γ signature) predicts pembrolizumab pan-tumor; high CXCL9/10 = inflamed TME; PDCD1LG2 co-induction = adaptive resistance | Score TIS per single cell; identify IFN-γ-responding vs non-responding regions |
| Type I IFN / cGAS-STING | IFNA1, IFNB1, MX1, ISG15, IFIT1, OAS1, RSAD2, SIGLEC1, IRF3, TBK1, CGAS, STING1 (12) | Type I IFN innate sensing; cGAS-STING activation | cGAS-STING boosts anti-tumor immunity; ISG score = IO response in dMMR/POLE tumors; pDC = type I IFN producers | Identify ISG-high IFN-producing cells; distinguish type I vs type II IFN response |
| 6 · DNA Damage / TMB / MSI · 22 genes | ||||
| MMR / Hypermutation | MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, POLE, POLD1, EPCAM, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, B2M, CDKN2A, CDK12, ARID1A, SETD2 (16) | MMR deficiency; hypermutation; neoantigen burden | dMMR/MSI-H = pembrolizumab pan-tumor; POLE ultramutator = high TMB; CDK12 loss = neo-antigen burden; B2M loss = ICI resistance | Link MMR/POLE expression to mutational state per tumor cell |
| DDR Proxies | ERCC2, RAD51, FANCD2, PALB2, CHEK1, PARP1 (6) | HRD signatures; DDR gene expression as TMB proxy | HRD = PARP inhibitor + ICI synergy; DDR gene expression correlates with somatic mutation burden | Correlate DDR expression with tumor mutational landscape |
| 7 · Metabolic Immune Escape · 28 genes | ||||
| Immunosuppressive Metabolism | IDO1, IDO2, TDO2, KYNU, ARG1, ARG2, NOS2, NT5E (CD73), ENTPD1 (CD39), ADORA2A (A2AR), LDHA, SLC7A11 (xCT), GLS, FASN (14) | Tryptophan/arginine/adenosine depletion; metabolic immune suppression | IDO1/TDO2 = tryptophan depletion suppresses T cells; CD39/CD73/A2AR = adenosine immunosuppression axis; all IO combination targets | Identify IDO1+ immunosuppressive cells; map adenosine pathway per single cell |
| Intrinsic Resistance Programs | BCL2, BCL2L1, MCL1, BIRC5, YAP1, AXL, GAS6, WNT5A, CTNNB1, MYC, VEGFA, HIF1A (12) - overlap trimmed | Tumor intrinsic survival; WNT/YAP/AXL resistance axes | AXL = innate ICI resistance in melanoma/NSCLC; WNT/β-catenin = immune desert; YAP1 = CAF/IO resistance | Identify AXL-high resistance state; link WNT activity to immune exclusion |
Total: 221 genesCat 1: 118 · Cat 2: 40 · Cat 3: 48 · Cat 4: 31 · Cat 5: 28 · Cat 6: 22 · Cat 7: 28
ⓘ Select genes appear in more than one functional category reflecting their multi-role biology. The total above counts unique genes; per-category counts include all category-relevant entries.